The Supreme Court Could Make it Harder to Vote by Mail in the Midterms

New York Times
by Nick Corasaniti
March 22, 2026
6 views
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

RNC is pushing Supreme Court to reject mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, potentially discarding thousands of votes.

How This Affects You

If you rely on mail voting, your ballot could be thrown out even if postmarked by Election Day, eliminating your vote in closely contested races.

AI Summary

The Republican National Committee is pushing the Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, a legal challenge that could disproportionately affect Democratic voters who tend to rely more heavily on mail voting. The case hinges on whether states can accept ballots postmarked by Election Day but received in the days after, a practice currently permitted in many jurisdictions. If the Court rules in the RNC's favor, potentially thousands of votes could be discarded in upcoming midterm elections, reshaping electoral outcomes in closely contested races. The challenge touches on a longstanding tension between ballot access and election security, with the RNC arguing for stricter deadlines while voting-rights advocates warn of disenfranchisement. The outcome could significantly alter mail-voting procedures nationwide ahead of the midterms.

What's Being Done

The Republican National Committee is pursuing a legal challenge before the Supreme Court to invalidate such ballots.

Source Coverage Map

4 of 43 tracked sources covered this story

9% coverage
Did Not Cover (39)
ICIJ97AP World News96AP News96AP US News96AP Top News96+34 more

Following this story?

Get notified when new coverage appears

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

US Supreme Court conservatives lean toward Republican bid to limit mail-in voting - Reuters
Politics

US Supreme Court conservatives lean toward Republican bid to limit mail-in voting - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMisgFBVV95cUxOX3JjeWJJX2dwT2dRbmFSck42Rmt5T045VWotRGtxZklSU1FmVTMxQVBmZnZTaGhyaGI4SnN0azRZdWU4ZDBrMVpYcHZTN3hkUGo0T2Y5SnZ6d1ltc29xN2hycU1oTHFQcGJDUnZTWE9JTG9pSzJWRlpSRnZiX3pXWV82Y2dkWjkyYllJWS1qcFhZY2NTa19xTTZrTzFYNnd4MmoybXI0dUc5X3JiOXE3ZUFn?oc=5" target="_blank">US Supreme Court weighs Republican bid to limit mail-in voting</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 23
Supreme Court backs officer seeking immunity from Vermont House protester’s excessive force claims
Civil Rights

Supreme Court backs officer seeking immunity from Vermont House protester’s excessive force claims

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a police officer who forcibly removed a protester conducting a sit-in on the Vermont House floor a decade ago is entitled to qualified immunity. The ruling was unsigned but appeared to split 6-3 along ideological lines, with the liberal justices in dissent. They voted to let the case proceed to trial. The case stems from a…

The HillMar 23
Supreme Court revives suit from evangelical Christian challenging restrictions on demonstrations - AP News
Civil Rights

Supreme Court revives suit from evangelical Christian challenging restrictions on demonstrations - AP News

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipAFBVV95cUxPb1c3NVprZEgyLTFRc2g2MWNORk5LaUFuZmJPQVphdXkyRFJkOEwtNk5ha0IxMW9mT19LSnJDdmcwcnRqWmpxa2phSlM1NDViQV9iVkx1NE4ya0psc2ZmYVlzU0d6OENnRlA1MWpSbjIyTk1uSXF2d2hqdVpQZXVnM2JUemhBVVFtcnZTU2Iwd1NFU2QzSWZJRGxPclpha1JLYS13Ug?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court revives suit from evangelical Christian challenging restrictions on demonstrations</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>

AP NewsMar 20
As Trump blocks asylum seekers, Supreme Court to decide if US must review claims
Civil Rights

As Trump blocks asylum seekers, Supreme Court to decide if US must review claims

A major legal battle over the ability of asylum seekers to apply for refuge in the U.S. at ports of entry along the border with Mexico lands at the Supreme Court.

ABC NewsMar 24
'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today
Politics

'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiugFBVV95cUxPNTlzai1Eci1uTnZCRVVZRFluN2gxQ2tYUkQwTHhDWHhwM0JHVVhGTGtEQktmNjNWdjdmUHJtSUhZTEVqcjg5ZWhHS2ZPdnVQRXNCTW5neERMd0ZtOTdjbnFHYXlLcVk1RVlfXzJCektyZzVUMEpYdy04ZDhkN0tCOVhOR3hVWjlBMm5TVGd5Qkd3ODBVQmZWMUZ5Z0t4V05mSVBCbk4wYm9wdU5Fc0NFTkVmb2g1M2VBU3c?oc=5" target="_blank">'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">USA Today</font>

USA TodayMar 24
Trump, Who Calls Mail-in Voting ‘Cheating,’ Just Voted by Mail
Politics

Trump, Who Calls Mail-in Voting ‘Cheating,’ Just Voted by Mail

President Trump has long fixated on mail-in-voting to bolster his baseless claims of widespread voter fraud. But he recently used the method in a Florida special election.

New York TimesMar 24
Read Next
Defense Secretary Hegseth intervened to stop promotions of Black and female officers
Civil Rights

Defense Secretary Hegseth intervened to stop promotions of Black and female officers

The four Army officers were on track to become one-star generals, NPR confirms. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth's involvement in the promotion process is highly unusual.

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources