Supreme Court to consider deadlines for late-arriving mail ballots, as Trump continues attacks - CBS News
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
Supreme Court will decide whether states can count mail ballots arriving after Election Day.
How This Affects You
The Court's ruling could change how your state counts mail-in votes in future elections, potentially affecting whether your late-arriving ballot is counted.
AI Summary
The Supreme Court has agreed to consider a case involving deadlines for mail ballots that arrive after Election Day, a voting procedure that has become a focal point of partisan debate. The case will likely address whether states can count ballots received days or weeks after polls close, a practice that varies significantly across the country and has drawn scrutiny from Republican-led challenges in recent election cycles. The decision comes as President Trump continues his public criticism of mail-voting procedures, which he has characterized as vulnerable to fraud—a claim not supported by widespread evidence. The Court's ruling could reshape how states handle late-arriving ballots and potentially affect future elections, particularly in closely contested races where mail-in voting plays a significant role. The justices' eventual decision will likely determine whether states maintain flexibility in counting procedures or must enforce tighter post-Election Day deadlines.
What's Being Done
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case and will issue a ruling that determines post-Election Day ballot counting procedures.
Source Coverage Map
4 of 43 tracked sources covered this story
Following this story?
Get notified when new coverage appears
Other Sources Covering This Story
5 sourcesMultiple outlets have reported on this story. Compare perspectives from different sources.

LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court considers late-arriving mail ballot laws in case that may affect midterms

The Supreme Court Could Make It Harder to Vote by Mail in the Midterms - The New York Times
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
PoliticsSupreme Court considers letting Trump administration revive restrictive immigration asylum policy - AP News
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilwFBVV95cUxOSUsxVlpjV0FQM1l2UHN6eGFXUk5yQ0FpRDRVYzJMQkw3amxOVHJpLWxNVldfMmZzWmc1SHB1UFlGUDFGNzVXQmhsZmdfN3BtcGpLajBSSnJYX1B6Wnpuc09td1doTkxjczFNdVBlQ1VsckY3ZWhYQ004NF9LeEdjZWk4MFoxcm1LMURpNTFWV2VfQ21SZ0tV?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court considers letting Trump administration revive restrictive immigration asylum policy</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>
PoliticsUS Supreme Court conservatives lean toward Republican bid to limit mail-in voting - Reuters
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMisgFBVV95cUxOX3JjeWJJX2dwT2dRbmFSck42Rmt5T045VWotRGtxZklSU1FmVTMxQVBmZnZTaGhyaGI4SnN0azRZdWU4ZDBrMVpYcHZTN3hkUGo0T2Y5SnZ6d1ltc29xN2hycU1oTHFQcGJDUnZTWE9JTG9pSzJWRlpSRnZiX3pXWV82Y2dkWjkyYllJWS1qcFhZY2NTa19xTTZrTzFYNnd4MmoybXI0dUc5X3JiOXE3ZUFn?oc=5" target="_blank">US Supreme Court weighs Republican bid to limit mail-in voting</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>
Civil RightsAs Trump blocks asylum seekers, Supreme Court to decide if US must review claims
A major legal battle over the ability of asylum seekers to apply for refuge in the U.S. at ports of entry along the border with Mexico lands at the Supreme Court.
PoliticsSupreme Court conservatives grapple with ‘metering’ rules in key immigration case
The Supreme Court debated Tuesday whether the government can turn back asylum-seekers attempting to reach a port of entry, a practice that originated in the Obama administration that President Trump now wants the right to potentially restore. Known as “metering,” border officials would turn back migrants before they could physically cross the border. The policy…
Politics'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiugFBVV95cUxPNTlzai1Eci1uTnZCRVVZRFluN2gxQ2tYUkQwTHhDWHhwM0JHVVhGTGtEQktmNjNWdjdmUHJtSUhZTEVqcjg5ZWhHS2ZPdnVQRXNCTW5neERMd0ZtOTdjbnFHYXlLcVk1RVlfXzJCektyZzVUMEpYdy04ZDhkN0tCOVhOR3hVWjlBMm5TVGd5Qkd3ODBVQmZWMUZ5Z0t4V05mSVBCbk4wYm9wdU5Fc0NFTkVmb2g1M2VBU3c?oc=5" target="_blank">'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">USA Today</font>
PoliticsTrump, Who Calls Mail-in Voting ‘Cheating,’ Just Voted by Mail
President Trump has long fixated on mail-in-voting to bolster his baseless claims of widespread voter fraud. But he recently used the method in a Florida special election.

The Case That Could Upend Who Gets to Be an American Is Back at the Supreme Court
Next week, the Trump administration’s bid to deny birthright citizenship to the US-born children of undocumented immigrants and non-green card holders through an executive order will arrive at the Supreme Court—yet again. Last year, the justices didn’t address the constitutionality of the order directly; instead, they ruled on a procedural question to limit the power […]
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
Fentanyl found inside Barbies sold at Missouri discount store, police say

US moves to soften capital rules: ‘Big banks can declare mission accomplished’

Senate deal reached to cap insulin costs

Pentagon's limits on press access unconstitutional, US judge rules - Reuters

Iran built a vast camera network to control dissent. Israel used it to track targets, AP sources say





