Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music - The New York Times

The New York Times
March 25, 2026
6 views
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

The Supreme Court ruled that internet service providers cannot be held liable for users' pirated music downloads, narrowing copyright holders' enforcement options.

AI Summary

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an internet service provider in a copyright dispute involving pirated music, rejecting arguments that ISPs should be held liable for users' infringing activity on their networks. The case centered on whether internet providers bear responsibility for facilitating copyright violations when subscribers use their services to download or stream unauthorized content. The decision narrows the legal exposure of ISPs and limits copyright holders' ability to pursue internet providers as defendants in infringement cases. The ruling reflects the Court's interpretation of existing copyright law regarding secondary liability—the question of who is responsible when a third party enables or profits from someone else's violation. Music and entertainment industry groups had sought broader ISP accountability, while internet providers argued they should not be held liable simply for providing the infrastructure that others misuse.

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
Civil Rights

In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 29
US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?
Civil Rights

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?

<p>The court ruled 8-1 against a Colorado law banning ‘conversion therapy’ for youth. What does it mean for other states, and why did two liberals side with conservatives?</p><p>The US supreme court ruled 8-1 this week against a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” for youth, in a case that could have major consequences for transgender and queer youth across the US, and for healthcare more broadly.</p><p>Colorado’s 2019 <a href="https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2019a_1129_signed.pdf">law</a> prohibits licensed clinicians from seeking to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of youth patients under 18. It is <a href="https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/conversion_therapy">one of 23 states</a> with similar restrictions.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-ruling-impact-meaning">Continue reading...</a>

The Guardian US NewsApr 2
Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico
Civil Rights

Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNV3ZPZWlfWTNxN3FXLWRDd1l0ZnRWVVVENVR3WExVRE9pbGo4VVdrZU92bllWTjA4d05LRmZyZThsRVJHODNHVFVKUHh2QkQtT3ZYeF9YdnZLdThUUjBISk5odlRQdE16a3pwSDhJbjkzRWFmMTN6X3RmSEhPM1dWc05xZEtISU9Ba3NYU2lGSFN4cTNzYk1ocW9tVlE?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Politico</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2lLbXBibEVCRmR4NzlKdWRGT1FpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>

PoliticoMar 29
Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News
Civil Rights

Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxNUFBCX2dpMjY0b05kTDRsdUNVTVhGVGtVV0JpU2NBd3c3MGNKenk0TDVnYjVreHBocFhTV3RIVmF3UV8yUnY3NXNXN1pYQm9hbTRER2x4eVF0T183RmFRRk5reHhxcG1ISWtTYVlsMHNjVGpXM3lVd1ZNazk2YllNUEdRS1ZjUEpyUndsWFVBTlUyMncxNzVFSVQ1TngwNkNHbk5NdWhGcml2OWVW?oc=5" target="_blank">Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>

AP NewsMar 29
As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
Politics

As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.

NPRMar 30
Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments
Politics

Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments

President Donald Trump has attended oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, marking a first for a sitting president.

PBS NewsHourApr 1
Read Next
Nuclear rockets, moon bases and NASA’s Mars plan
Technology

Nuclear rockets, moon bases and NASA’s Mars plan

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources