Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music - The New York Times
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
The Supreme Court ruled that internet service providers cannot be held liable for users' pirated music downloads, narrowing copyright holders' enforcement options.
AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an internet service provider in a copyright dispute involving pirated music, rejecting arguments that ISPs should be held liable for users' infringing activity on their networks. The case centered on whether internet providers bear responsibility for facilitating copyright violations when subscribers use their services to download or stream unauthorized content. The decision narrows the legal exposure of ISPs and limits copyright holders' ability to pursue internet providers as defendants in infringement cases. The ruling reflects the Court's interpretation of existing copyright law regarding secondary liability—the question of who is responsible when a third party enables or profits from someone else's violation. Music and entertainment industry groups had sought broader ISP accountability, while internet providers argued they should not be held liable simply for providing the infrastructure that others misuse.
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
Civil RightsIn Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>
Civil RightsUS supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?
<p>The court ruled 8-1 against a Colorado law banning ‘conversion therapy’ for youth. What does it mean for other states, and why did two liberals side with conservatives?</p><p>The US supreme court ruled 8-1 this week against a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” for youth, in a case that could have major consequences for transgender and queer youth across the US, and for healthcare more broadly.</p><p>Colorado’s 2019 <a href="https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2019a_1129_signed.pdf">law</a> prohibits licensed clinicians from seeking to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of youth patients under 18. It is <a href="https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/conversion_therapy">one of 23 states</a> with similar restrictions.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-ruling-impact-meaning">Continue reading...</a>
Civil RightsSupreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNV3ZPZWlfWTNxN3FXLWRDd1l0ZnRWVVVENVR3WExVRE9pbGo4VVdrZU92bllWTjA4d05LRmZyZThsRVJHODNHVFVKUHh2QkQtT3ZYeF9YdnZLdThUUjBISk5odlRQdE16a3pwSDhJbjkzRWFmMTN6X3RmSEhPM1dWc05xZEtISU9Ba3NYU2lGSFN4cTNzYk1ocW9tVlE?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Politico</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2lLbXBibEVCRmR4NzlKdWRGT1FpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>
Civil RightsSome familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxNUFBCX2dpMjY0b05kTDRsdUNVTVhGVGtVV0JpU2NBd3c3MGNKenk0TDVnYjVreHBocFhTV3RIVmF3UV8yUnY3NXNXN1pYQm9hbTRER2x4eVF0T183RmFRRk5reHhxcG1ISWtTYVlsMHNjVGpXM3lVd1ZNazk2YllNUEdRS1ZjUEpyUndsWFVBTlUyMncxNzVFSVQ1TngwNkNHbk5NdWhGcml2OWVW?oc=5" target="_blank">Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>
PoliticsAs birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.
PoliticsWhispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments
President Donald Trump has attended oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, marking a first for a sitting president.

Nuclear rockets, moon bases and NASA’s Mars plan
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
After 16 years and $8 billion, the military's new GPS software still doesn't work

US paves way for private assets to be included in 401(k) retirement plans - Reuters

Trump administration scales back on asylum crackdown, sources say

European nations warn over Israel’s planned expansion of death penalty

WTO talks near deal on reform roadmap amid US-India e-commerce deadlock - Reuters

