The Epstein Files

Epstein's former attorney testifies he had 'no knowledge whatsoever' of crimes

Epstein's former attorney testifies to House committee, says he didn't know about the abuse

Norway's crown princess tearful as she speaks out on friendship with Jeffrey Epstein

Norway's crown princess speaks out on ties to Jeffrey Epstein

OverlookedMar 20, 2026

Epstein’s former attorney tells House panel he didn’t know about the abuse - AP News

Bondi, Garcia and Comer speak after Democrats walk out of Epstein briefing

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee walked out of a Wednesday briefing with Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that Bondi refused to commit to honoring a subpoena issued by GOP Chairman James Comer. Bondi responded to reporters that she would "follow the law," while Comer characterized the walkout as "premeditated," signaling escalating partisan tensions over an Epstein-related investigation. The clash underscores friction between the Trump administration's Justice Department and Democratic lawmakers over the scope and independence of executive branch inquiries into the convicted sex offender's case.

Epstein lawyer Darren Indyke says he had "no knowledge whatsoever" of crimes

Darren Indyke, a lawyer who worked closely with Jeffrey Epstein, testified before the House Oversight Committee on Thursday and denied having any knowledge of the convicted sex offender's crimes. Indyke's appearance before Congress comes as part of a broader investigation into Epstein's network and the people who facilitated or enabled his operations. His testimony is significant because lawyers and associates in Epstein's circle have faced scrutiny over what they knew about his abuse of young women and girls, and whether they took action to stop it. The House committee's questioning of Indyke reflects ongoing congressional interest in accountability for those who had access to information about Epstein's misconduct before his arrest in 2019.

Norway crown princess to address Epstein links as son's rape trial closes

Norway's Crown Princess Mette-Marit is set to give a televised interview Friday addressing her connections to Jeffrey Epstein, the financier convicted of sex trafficking before his 2019 jail death. The interview comes as her son's rape trial concludes, marking her first public statement on the scrutiny her family has faced following revelations about her past association with Epstein. The Norwegian royal family has faced mounting pressure over reports that Mette-Marit knew Epstein decades ago, a connection that has drawn international media attention and raised questions about the monarchy's handling of the matter. Her son's legal case has intensified public focus on the family's credibility and judgment. The timing of the interview suggests an attempt by the palace to address the controversy directly before further developments emerge.

Warren calls on Federal Reserve nominee to explain Epstein links

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, has demanded that Kevin Warsh, President Trump's nominee to chair the Federal Reserve, explain his connections to Jeffrey Epstein following the release of DOJ emails referencing their interactions. Warsh, a former Federal Reserve governor, is undergoing Senate confirmation review for the central bank's leadership position. Warren's inquiry signals potential Democratic opposition to his nomination based on the Epstein emails, which were disclosed through a DOJ document release. The challenge comes as Warsh faces Senate scrutiny over his background and qualifications ahead of a likely confirmation hearing. Warsh's response to Warren's letter will likely shape the confirmation debate among Banking Committee members.

Comer on Democrats walking out of Epstein meeting: ‘Low point’ of investigation

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer accused Democrats of orchestrating a walkout during a closed-door meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi on the Epstein investigation, characterizing their departure as a "low point" and a "premeditated stunt." The walkout occurred as the committee conducts a broad investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and related matters. Comer's criticism reflects deepening partisan tensions within the committee over how the investigation should proceed and be conducted. The incident underscores divisions between Republicans and Democrats on the panel over their approach to the sensitive matter.

Longtime Epstein lawyer ‘had no knowledge’ of his crimes, he testifies to House committee

Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime lawyer and co-executor of his estate, testified Thursday before the House oversight and reform committee that he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes during his employment. Epstein survivors have previously accused Indyke of helping facilitate the deceased financier's abuse, making his denial a direct rebuttal to their allegations. The closed-door deposition marks a congressional effort to examine the legal and financial infrastructure that may have enabled Epstein's criminal enterprise to operate for years. Indyke's testimony is significant because as estate co-executor, he maintained control over Epstein's assets and had deep involvement in his business affairs. The case continues to draw scrutiny over how Epstein managed to shield his operations from detection despite employing high-profile legal counsel.

Democrats move to impeach Pam Bondi after ‘fake’ Jeffrey Epstein briefing – US politics live

Democrats are moving to impeach Attorney General Pam Bondi after she refused to commit to testifying under oath during a closed-door briefing about her handling of Epstein-related matters, despite being issued a subpoena. The briefing prompted Democratic lawmakers to walk out in protest, with anger mounting over what they characterize as her evasiveness on a high-profile case. Bondi's refusal to pledge compliance with an oath raises questions about the Trump administration's willingness to cooperate with congressional oversight on sensitive matters. An impeachment effort would represent a dramatic escalation of tensions between the White House and Democrats over executive branch accountability. The cancellation of Trump's working lunch with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to extend their summit underscores the administration's focus on international relations during the controversy.

Jeffrey Epstein’s elite relationships visualised: the banker, the economist and the director

The Guardian has analyzed over a million emails from Jeffrey Epstein's archives to map his relationships with prominent figures in business, finance, and the arts, revealing the scope of the disgraced financier's connections to the wealthy and powerful. The analysis—the second part of a two-part investigation—identifies specific high-profile ties, including economist and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, filmmaker Woody Allen, and Jes Staley, the ex-chief of Barclays Bank. The email trove, which has been central to understanding Epstein's network since his arrest and death in custody in 2019, has been difficult to parse due to its sheer volume, prompting The Guardian's visualization of key relationships. The investigation aims to clarify the extent and nature of Epstein's connections to figures across multiple industries, contributing to ongoing public accountability for those linked to the convicted sex offender.

Epstein's longtime lawyer to testify to House committee today

Epstein's longtime lawyer is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee on Thursday as part of an ongoing investigation into the disgraced financier's criminal network. The lawyer, who represented Epstein for decades and later became executor of his estate, is expected to be questioned about his knowledge of Epstein's operations and associates. The testimony comes as Congress continues examining how Epstein maintained his abusive scheme for years and whether others enabled or covered up his crimes. House investigators have been pressing for information from people in Epstein's inner circle to determine what they knew and when. The appearance signals the committee's determination to pursue leads connected to potential accomplices or enablers in one of the most significant sex-trafficking cases in recent U.S. history.

Police investigating bailout email from Mandelson to Epstein

London police are investigating an email from Peter Mandelson to Jeffrey Epstein regarding a potential bailout, with Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley saying officers are examining whether the communication constitutes a criminal offense. The investigation centers on the nature and content of the correspondence between the former British government official and the disgraced financier. Rowley's public acknowledgment that police are treating the matter as potentially criminal signals the seriousness with which investigators are approaching the case. The email's existence raises questions about Mandelson's involvement with Epstein and potential misconduct. No charges have been announced, and the investigation appears to be in its preliminary stages.

'I will follow the law,' Bondi says after Dems storm out of Epstein files briefing

Democrats walked out of a closed-door briefing on files related to Jeffrey Epstein, calling it a "fake hearing" and staging what they characterized as a protest against the proceedings. Bondi, responding to the walkout, stated "I will follow the law" in a comment addressing the dispute over the briefing format and its legitimacy. Republicans accused the departing Democrats of orchestrating a "premeditated" stunt rather than engaging substantively with the materials being presented. The episode reflects deep partisan divisions over how classified or sensitive materials involving the disgraced financier should be reviewed and disclosed. The briefing's closed-door nature became the flashpoint, with Democrats rejecting the format as inadequate for proper oversight.

Democrats walk out of heated Epstein files briefing

Democrats walked out of a briefing on Epstein files being conducted by US Attorney General Pam Bondi, signaling deep partisan tensions over how the Trump administration is handling the release of documents related to the financier's connections and activities. The walkout reflects broader Democratic concerns about the briefing process or the administration's approach to the sensitive material, which has long been a focal point of public interest and conspiracy theories. The incident underscores the polarized atmosphere in Congress over how classified or restricted Epstein-related documents should be disclosed and to whom. Democrats' departure suggests they view either the briefing itself or Bondi's stewardship of the process as inadequate or problematic, though their specific grievances were not detailed in available reporting.

House Democrats walk out of tense briefing with Bondi over Epstein files

House Democrats walked out of a closed-door briefing with Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday, citing tensions over the Justice Department's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The exodus signals deepening frustration among Democrats regarding how the Trump administration is managing the probe into Epstein and his associates. The Epstein case has long been a flashpoint for congressional Democrats, who have demanded transparency and accountability around the financier's connections to powerful figures. The walkout underscores the partisan divide over DOJ priorities and suggests Democrats intend to maintain pressure on Bondi's department to release information related to the investigation. It remains unclear what specific disclosures or actions prompted the Democrats' departure from the briefing.

Child seen in sex abuse videos identified after researcher spots school badge

A researcher identified a child victim of sexual abuse by spotting a school badge visible in explicit videos of the exploitation, according to reporting by the BBC. The analyst's discovery came after years of investigative work attempting to locate the victim. Identifying victims in abuse material is critical for law enforcement investigations and enabling survivors to access support and justice. The case illustrates both the potential of meticulous analysis in child protection work and the ongoing challenge of locating victims of online sexual abuse. The findings underscore how seemingly small details in abuse material can prove pivotal in safeguarding investigations.